Quantum leap east west hollywood strings wiki

Quantum leap east west hollywood strings wiki pro#

Quantum leap east west hollywood strings wiki pro#

No project is too big or small, so give us a call today and let's talk gear! Pro Tools HD 11 does not support Windows 8. (Cinema Audio Society), BAFTA, and EMMY award-winning sound engineer SHAWN MURPHY, who has recorded and mixed the scores for more than 300 feature films including Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones, Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith, Star Wars: A Musical Journey, Jurassic Park, Jurassic Park The Lost World, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Titanic, etc. I guess that depends on the individual.HOLLYWOOD STRINGS has many groundbreaking features not found in any other collection. Of course, it can also be a bit challenging for some for that very same reason. You can use it for more than just one style of music, too. Since it's so dry, it's easier to put it into a space and blend it with another library. However, I think it's more- what's the word I'm looking for- flexible. You're correct about LASS being very expensive. I don't think CS2 is that wet when you use the Close mic'd samples. Hollywood Strings is much better in term of control, price and sample quality. The string libs from Spitfire are very nice but most of their stuff is very expensive.How could you dislike EWQL wet samples when you are using CS 2 with double wetness than Symphonic Orchestra? CS 2 is virtually can't mix with any other strings except Albion because of its super wet room. Mostly because they have so much reverb baked into them. People seem to love EWQL but I don't really like it. Very expensive though.ДЄt 10/2/15 02:01 PM, dem0lecule wrote: At 10/2/15 02:00 AM, LloydeSorrow wrote: I've never used anything from VSL, but they do have some nice sounding instruments. I'm not really a fan of CineSample's stuff, to be honest. well, there's Sample Modeling's winds, but again, I've not used them as of yet, so I can't really vouch for 'em. The string libs from Spitfire are very nice but most of their stuff is very expensive.ДЇor woodwinds. It's quite small but that doesn't mean the sound isn't great! Check out some of the demos on the site. Of course, you'll have to put them in a space since they're dry. That's where freezing/bouncing tracks come in handy! They sound amazing though. Since these instruments use sample modeling to produce sound, they are quite CPU heavy. * Double Reeds (Oboe, English Horn, Bassoon, Contrabassoon) * Flutes (Flute, Piccolo, Alto & Bass Flutes) * Saxaphones (Baritone, Tenor, Alto & Soprano) * Horns & Tuba (four different French Horns and a Tuba) * Trumpets (Bв™ Trumpets, a Cornet, a Flugelhorn, a German Trumpet, and a Piccolo Trumpet) They have woodwinds as well (I haven't used those yet) and I believe they plan on adding strings to their catalog (I'm not 100% sure about that). I'm a few days late, but for Brass I recommend Sample Modeling. So what are your favorite orchestral VST's? I have been using a lot of synths lately, but I think it is time to invest in something more organic. It's painfully outdated, and the only work they have done is adding more to it, not fixing the bad old stuff. As someone who used GPO (the latest version) for several years prior to getting EWQL SO, I honestly wouldn't recommend it to anyone. It has the BROADEST range of instruments of any library, some fairly smart script work, and lately has incorporated some stuff from other sample libraries to make up for its own shortcomings, but it really only shines if you want your music to sound like the late 1990s. occasionally two, zero RR, sampled in minor thirds, and was mostly recorded half a decade before EWQL SO was recorded. But nothing beat EWQL SO in term of quality and price so far. Reasonable pricing and pretty ok sample quality. In terms of dry libraries, VSL is the only one I know, aside from like, WIVI Band (I THINK it is dry) and Garritan.Garritan Orchestra has improved a lot and they're getting better. VSL has always been too expensive for most people, and Spitfire is even more so. There really aren't any affordable but quality complete orchestral libraries 'below' EWQL SO, and that's why it's so popular, over a decade after it came out.